NextGen Tech SolutionsRequest a proposal →
Custom engineering service

LLM and AI Agent Systems Built Around Your Tools

We build agentic systems that can retrieve knowledge, call approved tools, follow workflows and hand control back to people when needed.

Discuss your project
01KNOWLEDGEDocuments · RAG · search
02AGENTModel · state · orchestration
03TOOLSAPIs · apps · databases
04CONTROLEvals · permissions · review

Agent workflows

Design agents around explicit tools, permissions and task boundaries.

  • Tool calling and orchestration
  • Multi-step workflows
  • Memory and state handling
  • Human-in-the-loop approvals

RAG and knowledge systems

Use your approved documents and data sources to ground responses.

  • Document ingestion
  • Vector search
  • Citation-aware retrieval patterns
  • Evaluation datasets

Model integration

Work with commercial or open models based on cost, privacy and capability needs.

  • Open-source model serving
  • API model integration
  • Fallback routing
  • Prompt and context engineering

Evaluation and deployment

Move beyond demos with repeatable tests and deployment documentation.

  • Task-level evals
  • Failure-case testing
  • Logging and observability
  • Containerized deployment options

What makes an AI agent different from a chatbot?

A chatbot mainly responds with text. An agent can be given a bounded set of tools and permissions so it can retrieve records, call APIs, update a system, create a draft or move a workflow forward. The important engineering question is not whether the model can “reason”, but what actions it is allowed to take and how those actions are validated.

Core components of a production agent

  • Tool layer: typed, permissioned functions for the systems the agent is allowed to use.
  • State and memory: explicit task state plus only the conversation or business context that is actually needed.
  • Knowledge retrieval: RAG or search over approved documents with source metadata and freshness rules.
  • Guardrails: validation, allowlists, approval gates, rate limits and error handling around model output.
  • Evaluation: a repeatable set of real tasks, failure cases and quality criteria rather than demo-only testing.
  • Observability: traces, tool-call logs, token/cost monitoring and clear failure reporting.

RAG systems need retrieval evaluation

Uploading documents into a vector database does not automatically produce reliable answers. Chunking, metadata, permissions, query rewriting and reranking can all affect retrieval quality. A useful evaluation set should contain questions with known supporting documents and check whether the right evidence is retrieved before judging the final model response.

Human approval is a design feature

High-impact actions such as sending external messages, changing customer records, issuing refunds or triggering financial operations may need explicit approval. Human-in-the-loop design lets the agent prepare work while keeping accountability and control with the appropriate person.

Model choice should follow the workload

Commercial APIs can be convenient for strong general capability and managed infrastructure. Open models can be useful when privacy, local deployment or predictable serving costs matter. A routing layer can send simple tasks to cheaper models and reserve stronger models for difficult steps, provided the behavior is evaluated on the actual workload.

How an agent project is validated

  1. Collect representative tasks and expected outcomes.
  2. Define tool permissions and unacceptable actions.
  3. Measure completion quality, tool accuracy and failure recovery.
  4. Test prompt injection, malformed inputs and missing data.
  5. Run a controlled pilot with logs and human review.
  6. Promote only the workflows that meet the agreed acceptance criteria.

Related resources